Care home death leads to warning
The Health and Safety Executive are warning residential care homes across the country that they must comply with official guidance to ensure the safety of residents. This follows a case at Worthing Magistrates’ Court where two owners of a care home were each fined £16,000 plus total costs of £22,600 after admitting that their actions led to the death of 86-year-old Bettina East. Care assistants did not follow temperature checking procedures, and lowered the lady into a bath of scalding water – she died a few days later.
Lack of risk assessment gives no right to sue for damages
A Court of Appeal decision published last month has clarified the law in respect of an absent manual handling risk assessment and a subsequent injury. Back in late 2006, Raymond Parr had been told by Southampton County Court that he was allowed to claim damages when he was injured during a handling task, on the basis that the employer had not carried out a suitable and sufficient risk assessment. Such an assessment is required under the Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992. His employer, Gravatom Engineering Systems Limited, appealed the decision because they felt that they had enough control measures already in place and the absence of the assessment did not contribute to the circumstance of the accident. However, the employer’s appeal was dismissed because there was no evidence to show that they had taken appropriate steps to reduce the risk of injury to the lowest level reasonably practicable. Failure to reduce the risk was the reason Mr Parr’s claim would succeed, not the failure to make an assessment.
Retailer fined for breaching asbestos laws
The Outdoor Group, owners of retailer Blacks, have been fined £150,000 for failure to protect employees and the public from possible exposure to asbestos fibres.
Kensington and Chelsea Council, who took the prosecution, explained that asbestos fibres were found in the basement store at the shop in Kensington High Street as long ago as May 2005. The company had failed to implement the findings of an asbestos survey, most likely for financial reasons according to the Judge. Stock contaminated with asbestos fibres had subsequently been taken from the room and moved to the shop.
Hotel chain fined for slip hazards
Travelodge suffered fines and costs totalling £70,000 at Cambridge Crown Court after failing to report two incidents when people fell over in bathrooms. One resulted in a guest being taken to hospital, yet for two years the hotel chain did not take suitable action to reduce the risks.
University compensates injured security guard
Security supervisor Ged Darlington had his collarbone broken by a suspected thief that he was trying to detain. When he saw someone trying to break into cash boxes at the student laundry, he gave chase and a struggle ensued. Manchester University paid him £13,000 as an out-of-court settlement after representations from the union Unison. Darlington had been encouraged to apprehend offenders, but had not had suitable training.
Micro-sleep causing crash was employer’s fault
Where an employer knowingly permits or causes a member of staff to work long hours and drive in the course of employment, the employer must take some responsibility for the consequences.
This was the finding by the Court of Appeal after Mr Eyres, a kitchen fitter for Atkinsons Kitchens and Bedrooms Limited, crashed his van after apparently falling briefly asleep after 19 hours of staying awake. The original judgment had been in favour of the employer, but Eyres’ appeal had succeeded because on the balance of probability the claimant was able to show he must have fallen asleep and his employer should have realised there was a risk of that.
The employer was held to be 67% to blame, but Eyres was partly responsible as he should have realised he was taking a chance by driving when tired.
First casualty of smoking ban
A pub landlord who set up a political party called Fight Against Government Suppression has lost his licence to serve alcohol in one of his bars after permitting smokers to carry on regardless. He was also fined £500. Blackpool Council, who brought the action, also found that he breached rules concerning the supply of drinks to under-age persons, and failed to keep adequate health and safety records.
|